Hello Sam,
Tim clarrified this earlier in the thread:
(!empty($user->lang['QUOTE'])) ? $user->lang['QUOTE'] : ucwords(strtolower(str_replace('_', ' ', 'QUOTE'))):
Tim Warris
Site Admin
Joined: 07 May 2004
Posts: 139
Location: Kitchener, Ontario
Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2005 11:56 am Post subject:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi,
"Grooves" is the wrong word to use to describe the treatment on the top of the ties. Lines is more precise. There are no "recesses" in the ties, just reference lines to indicate the outside edge of the base of the rail. This makes confirming the position of the rail much easier.
Sorry for the confusion.
These would be nice, along with laser cut holes to allow the passage of P87 spikes as demostrated by Ed Nadolski. In fact, I'd like to try using the tie plates and the "whole deal". This would probably represent the most realistic N-scale track, keeping the cost significantly low...well, at least for my Free-moN module!
-sd80mac-
sam (!empty($user->lang['WROTE'])) ? $user->lang['WROTE'] : ucwords(strtolower(str_replace('_', ' ', 'WROTE'))):
tim,
i was just wondering,
i noticed that the twist ties are all for TOs
have you considered them for just straight/curved sections of track?
also, you mentioned "grooves" for the rail,
are they actually depressed areas where the rail goes, compared to the rest of the tie?
or is it just a slight cut into the tie on either side of where the rail should be?